Don't invest unless you're prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong.
Risk Summary

Estimated reading time: 2 min

Due to the potential for losses, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) considers this investment to be high risk.

What are the key risks?

  • You could lose all the money you invest
  • Most investments are shares in start-up businesses or bonds issued by them. Investors in these shares or bonds often lose 100% of the money they invested, as most start-up businesses fail.
  • Checks on the businesses you are investing in, such as how well they are expected to perform, may not have been carried out by the platform you are investing through. You should do your own research before investing.

You won't get your money back quickly

  • Even if the business you invest in is successful, it will likely take several years to get your money back.
  • The most likely way to get your money back is if the business is bought by another business or lists its shares on an exchange such as the London Stock Exchange. These events are not common.
  • Start-up businesses very rarely pay you back through dividends. You should not expect to get your money back this way.
  • Some platforms may give you the opportunity to sell your investment early through a 'secondary market' or 'bulletin board', but there is no guarantee you will find a buyer at the price you are willing to sell.

Don't put all your eggs in one basket

  • Putting all your money into a single business or type of investment for example, is risky. Spreading your money across different investments makes you less dependent on any one to do well. A good rule of thumb is not to invest more than 10% of your money in high-risk investments. Learn more here.

The value of your investment can be reduced

  • If your investment is shares, the percentage of the business that you own will decrease if the business issues more shares. This could mean that the value of your investment reduces, depending on how much the business grows. Most start-up businesses issue multiple rounds of shares.
  • These new shares could have additional rights that your shares don't have, such as the right to receive a fixed dividend, which could further reduce your chances of getting a return on your investment.

You are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong

  • Protection from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), in relation to claims against failed regulated firms, does not cover poor investment performance. Try the FSCS investment protection checker.
  • Protection from the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) does not cover poor investment performance. If you have a complaint against an FCA-regulated platform, FOS may be able to consider it. Learn more about FOS protection here.

If you are interested in learning more about how to protect yourself, visit the FCA's website here.

For further information about investment-based crowdfunding, visit the crowdfunding section of the FCA's website here.

Weekly Briefing: AI Tax Shift, Business Flight Fears, Tax Burden Surge, Growth Reality Check
Weekly Briefing

Weekly Briefing: AI Tax Shift, Business Flight Fears, Tax Burden Surge, Growth Reality Check

This week’s stories point to a shift in where pressure is building across the UK economy.

There’s a longer-term question around how artificial intelligence could reshape taxation entirely, while in the short term, policy changes are already influencing business behaviour.

At the same time, the broader economic picture looks less stable once you look past the headline data.

Read on for the full context.

 

AI could reshape how governments raise revenue

There’s a growing argument that income tax, as we know it, may not hold up in an AI-driven economy. Tom Blomfield, founder of Monzo, suggested this week that within five years, it could become largely redundant.

The reasoning comes down to employment. If AI systems replace a meaningful share of human labour, then a tax system built on wages starts to break down. Governments would need to find alternative sources of revenue.

Blomfield’s view is that taxation could shift towards “compute” - essentially the infrastructure behind AI, like data centres. And actually, that’s not far off what others are suggesting. OpenAI has already discussed the idea of taxing automated labour or increasing reliance on capital-based taxes.

The scale of that shift would be significant. Right now, income tax and National Insurance make up around 42% of UK government revenue, while taxes on assets like shares and property account for just 4%. 

You can already see early signs of disruption. According to Adzuna, entry-level job postings have fallen by 35% since late 2022, around the time ChatGPT launched. That doesn’t prove causation, but it does show where pressure is starting to appear.

What this means for investors

  • A shift towards capital-based taxation could increase focus on asset structuring
  • Returns may be more heavily influenced by how gains are taxed rather than earned income
  • AI-driven productivity gains may not translate evenly across sectors
  • Policy risk around new forms of taxation is likely to increase

“I don’t think we’ll tax human labour, we’ll tax compute… and then we will use the proceeds to pay for government.”

 

Family business tax changes raise relocation concerns

At the same time as those longer-term discussions, current tax policy is already affecting behaviour.

Jo Bamford has said JCB could relocate to the US in response to new inheritance tax rules. The policy introduces a 20% tax on business assets above £2.5m when passed down through generations.

On paper, the threshold was increased from £1m to protect more businesses. But in practice, larger family-owned firms are still exposed, and that’s where the reaction is coming from.

Businesses may need to plan for liquidity events, reduce reinvestment, or restructure ownership to manage future liabilities.

This isn’t happening in isolation either. It follows the removal of the non-dom status, which has already led to concerns about wealth leaving the UK.

You can see how this connects back to the previous section. If capital becomes more mobile and tax pressure increases, relocation becomes a realistic option rather than a theoretical one.

Key conclusions

  • Potential reduction in UK-based private investment opportunities
  • Increased importance of tax-efficient structuring
  • Possible slight impact on long-term business growth and valuations
  • Greater sensitivity to policy changes when allocating capital

“You want us… to invest here in Britain… but there’s only so much you can ultimately do.”

 

UK set for fastest tax burden rise among advanced economies

These individual policy changes sit within a much broader trend.

According to the IMF, the UK’s tax burden is set to rise from 37.6% of GDP in 2024 to 42.1% by 2031. That’s the largest increase among advanced economies and the highest level in peacetime. To put that in context, the average increase across similar economies is just 0.9 percentage points.

The UK is expected to rise by 4.5.

That gap matters, as, of course, changes how competitive the UK looks from a capital allocation perspective. At the same time, growth expectations are weakening. The IMF now forecasts UK growth at just 0.8%, partly due to rising energy costs and external pressures.

Higher taxes, slower growth, and pressure on energy costs all feed into each other.

There’s also a policy question around where the additional tax revenue is going. Some criticism has focused on rising welfare spending, while investment in areas like energy production remains constrained. A key area where money is being spent is debt interest payments - central government debt interest payable in February 2026 was £13.0 billion, £5.5 billion more than in February last year.

How this may effect investors

  • Higher tax environment may reduce net returns
  • Slower growth impacting valuations and exit opportunities across the board, but highlights those able to cut through
  • Energy policy decisions could directly influence sector performance
  • Relative attractiveness of the UK versus other markets may shift

"The IMF data is straightforward - the UK is increasing its tax burden faster than any comparable economy."

 

Strong GDP data masks underlying economic pressure

The latest GDP figures suggest the UK economy grew by 0.5% in February, well ahead of expectations.

On the surface, that looks like quite positive signal. Growth was broad-based, with services and production both rising, and construction up by 1%. However, this data reflects conditions before the escalation of conflict in the Middle East.

Since then, the outlook has shifted. Energy prices have increased, inflation expectations have risen to around 3.3%, and the Bank of England is now less likely to cut rates.

You can see the disconnect. The data shows strength, but, unfortunately, the forward-looking indicators are now pointing in a different direction.

The labour market adds to that picture with unemployment moving above 5%, suggesting underlying softness despite the previous growth figure.

“While the February numbers would suggest we’re in a strong position, actually, the situation on the ground is probably not quite like that.”

 

Final Note

There isn’t a single dominant theme this week, but there is a clear direction of travel.

Tax pressure is increasing, growth expectations are softening, and early signs of structural change are starting to appear. How those play out together will matter more than any one data point.

Driving Growth.
Creating Value.
Delivering Impact.

Backed by

Growth Capital Ventures (GCV) is backed by funds managed by Maven Capital Partners, one of the UK’s leading private equity and alternative asset managers.